No. I'm saying these sources are citing each other, which is curious. As a conservative journalist, I often see useful (to me) ridiculous comments supposedly by liberals quoted in conservative columns. But when I try to track down the actual quote, I often come across this phenomenon: conservative columnists quoting each other. Sometimes I am able to track down the quote to the original publication, wire service, or news program, which I then cite - but sometimes I discover that the quote is apocryphal or wildly distorted.
You are calling some very reputable people "fringe."
Who?
it is funny how you see his sight as such a better source than John MacArthur's site, especially in light of your previous comments about him.
I said Schuller was a jerk. But an official transcript of a Schuller interview on his official site is by definition a primary source. Do you not see the difference, journalistically?
BTW, I was able to find actual audio of some of the Graham statement
http://www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?keyword=graham&entiresite=true
Click on Rev. David DiCanio Wed 5/11/2005
You have to wade through a lot of dreck, and the "reporter" himself actually says Graham came back after the break and corrected himself, although that is not included in the sound byte.
Corrected himself?
Graham corrected himself? [have heard of it a number of times]
That's no fair! He's supposed to be a whipping post of all the high and mighty spiritual leaders who consider themselves his better. He can't take the wind out of their sails like that! It's not very loving! /sar