[NonLinear]

THAT is what the discussion should be about, not the messenger.

When the messenger is clearly launching a biased and slanted, mostly unfounded attack, dragging out carefully selected 30-40 year old snips then it is quite appropriate to discuss the messenger.

But wait, of course, the evidence does not matter, it is about the seriousness of the charge. Where have I heard that before?

We are clearly going to disagree on the attack screed masquarading as an article. I'll try to remember to pray for "brother" Cloud and to thank God for putting him somewhere that I don't have to hear from him on a regular basis.

[Full Court]

If you find something in the article to be untrue, then please by all means point that out.

If not, don't attack the man who wrote the article.

It was written several years ago BTW.

[Full Court]

The worst thing for me is probably the fact that Graham does not believe that hell is real, and that he believes Pagan people can be saved without Jesus Christ.