Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: reductio
But you'd want to make sure you don't exercise your own private interpretation of this statement.

You, too.

Let me point out that the statement doesn't specify that they died without being baptised, without entering the Church. If one were to qualify this statement by stating that such persons had to have entered the Church before death, it would be an accurate statement.

It may be supposed that such persons would have desired Baptism explicitly if they had known its necessity."

That's the next sentence. It is clear that the subject is of those who do not know about baptism and never do.

Since you retain for yourself the ability to tell when the Catechism is teaching properly and when it is not, why not simply declare this section to be in error? It would be more intellectually honest than attempting to make nonsense of a passage.

SD

95 posted on 04/25/2006 1:37:22 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave; reductio

Argue the issues all you want - don't make it personal or suggest that you can read another poster's mind. Thanks.


97 posted on 04/25/2006 1:42:15 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: SoothingDave
It is an error to believe that baptism is not necessary for salvation.

There you have it.

99 posted on 04/25/2006 2:00:41 PM PDT by reductio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson