Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: george wythe
the Southern Baptist Convention's International Mission Board adopted a policy that forbids any of its future missionaries from having a "private prayer language."

I don't speak in tongues (my "private prayer language" is English), but it's fairly evident that there is greater support in scripture for the validity of tongues than not. The non-tongues denominations believe it has "ceased," but they base that upon a half a verse in I Corinthians.

7 posted on 04/24/2006 10:11:32 AM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: george wythe
but they base that upon a half a verse in I Corinthians.

I'm also convinced from my observations of the Conservative Baptist church that they pooh-pooh tongues, and other manifestations, not simply from scripture, as they'll contend, but from their exprience: their leaders have never experienced tongues and the like, so they are inclined not to consider it a valid gift for today. Hence, experience does play a large part in how many in the traditional, conservative evangelical churches view these things, despite the fact that they speak against basing one's theology upon experience.

8 posted on 04/24/2006 10:16:52 AM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson