These facts are often omitted by Orthodox Jews who are evolutionist or who hold that evolution is a legitimate interpretation of the Torah. This creates the impression that evolutionist Orthodox Jews buy into the JEPD/Biblical criticism/Torah-as-mythology philosophy without actually saying this and removes any real or perceived pressure not to be seen as "fundies" by the non-Jewish world. Personally, I regard it as cowardly and dishonest to defend Darwin while omitting the very important point that Darwin stops when Adam appears.
Nor do you hear much about some of the wilder theories of Orthodox Jewish evolutionists, such as that the dinosaurs evolved into the beings we know as angels today, that the earth is hollow and the home of demons, or that the tabernacle was made of the skin of unicorns. And yes, these are the beliefs of Orthodox Jews who criticize creationism for being unscientific! (NB: I am not ridiculing a "hollow earth" or another dimension inhabited by strange beasts per se; I am pointing out the inconsistency of holding to these things while using "science" to attack creationism.)
However, what Klinghoffer is attacking is not evolution per se but the notion of the eternity of the universe, once a dogma of atheists. Atheists today no longer claim the universe is eternal (admitting that at one point it didn't exist and then suddenly it did), but they insist that this big bang was a natural phenomenon, even though nature was the result of the big bang, was brought into existence by it, and therefore could not have caused the big bang (though there are a few of the more mystical atheists who believe that unalterable natural law exists outside reality as we know it, presiding over the creation and extinction of innumerable universes). Spontaneous self creation (which implies the big bang was caused by its result, natural law) is far more illogical than the mere eternity of the universe, and I wish Klinghoffer had said something about this.
What philosophical system would that be? Or do you mean science?
To explain the existence of life without reference to a deity was Darwin's entire purpose.
Uh, no, not even close according to the historical record.
You can count the number of creationist Jews on the fingers of one hand -- for good reason, because Jews aren't stupid.
Note: Darwin was a rebellious character who was a seminary student, gone bad...
reference ping
This is a falsehood. The DI list contains some scientists who earned their Ph.D.s at Berkeley Princeton and MIT, but not a single current researcher at any of the three places.
I belive in God, Intelligent Design, Torah and the "development" of life, which may take in evolution.