[Invincibly Ignorant]

Nice try, but you've been steadily backing away from your original assertion, and now you're caught dead to rights.

I must have missed backing away from something.

The only evidence we have is that Saul was a Pharisee, there is no evidence to the contrary. Unless you want to contend that the whole thing is a fabrication, in which case there is really nothing to discuss with you.

He can say he's a pharisee all he wants. Talk is cheap. Most of his actions, as depicted in NT writings, confirm otherwise.

[AnAmericanMother]

Like I said, there's no point in discussing this further.

It's like trying to nail jello to the wall.