Don't split hairs. Your demand that Vatican II be declared "null and void" is tantamount to saying the Council was illegitimate.
I never called you a heretic or a schismatic.
During his Christmas address to the Curia on Dec. 22, Benedict XVI said that many theologians have wrongly interpreted Vatican II as repudiating what the Church taught before the Council. Moreover, these people have preferred to follow a mythical "spirit of Vatican II" rather than its letter. They have used this "spirit of Vatican II" to advocate changes that the Council did not order and to promote teachings it did not endorse. However, the pope did not conclude that we must declare the Council to be "null and void" but rather that we must interpret it in light of Tradition. (Tradition refers to doctrine NOT practice.) That is, the decrees of the Council are consistent with everything that the Church taught up to that time and they must be interpreted in the light of earlier teaching.
When you advocate that Rome declare the Council to be "null and void," you are wrongly blaming the Council for the misinterpretation and misuse of its decrees by Modernist theologians and experts who used them to promote their own agenda. But you are not following the mind of the pope.
Finally, I have nothing against the Tridentine Mass; I think it would be good if the pope grants permssion for its universal celebration. However, as you have pointed out, the discontent of radical Traditionalists is not really based upon the fact that the Tridentine Mass is not available in many places. It is based upon their misinterpretation and rejection of Vatican II, which they blame for everything bad that has happened in the Church over the last 40 years. You wait and see: if the pope grants this permission, many Traditionalists will still demand the suppression of the Missal of Paul VI and for the decrees of Vatican II to be revoked.