Replies

"A super Catholic is someone who thinks he is more Catholic than the Pope, the Church, other benighted Catholics, such as myself, who fail to see the illegitimacy of the Council."

I am not saying I am more catholic than anyone... I am legitimately trying to open some peoples eyes to some very grave issues within the church.

I never said the council was illegitmate...just that the outcome that stemmed from it was the problem. The modernists took it and ran with it...making the thigns that were optional the most common.

"What does communion in the hand have to do with the validity of the words of Consecration?"

As I said in a previous post...if you think/believe that transubstantiation takes place under the new Canon, and then take the transubstanitated host IN YOUR HAND, which has been proven to transfer particles due to oils in the skin, static electricity, or whatever...then you are abusing the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Our Lord, because I am pretty sure you do not receive ablution when you return to the pew.

Why do you think in the rubrics of the TLM that the thumb and forefinger of the priest do not come apart after saying "HOC EST ENIM CORPUS MEUM" (FOR THIS IS MY BODY)

But - even dismissing that for a second - let me ask you this: Are your hands or the hands of a SME "consecrated and anointed" to touch the Sacred Host?

Think about it....

Well, which is it? Was the outcome of Vatican II bad or was the Council itself illegitimate? Here is what you said on your blog:

"If the Vatican TRULY wanted to grab my attention, and to have me . . . think that they are serious about correcting problems within the Church, the only course of action to be taken would be to declare the Second Vatican Council NULL AND VOID! [your emphasis]"

Doesn't your reply to me contradict what you yourself wrote?