[balrog666]

Did he add any examples of irreducible complexity that really are irreducibly complex?

No.

He did not correct any of the original errors.

[truthfinder9]

Actually Behe has answered in detail the empty claims of the Darwin Fundies (of course the Darwin Fundie Newsletter probably forgot to mention these):

Responses to Critics

• The Lamest Attempt Yet to Answer the Challenge Irreducible Complexity Poses for Darwinian Evolution
  Michael Behe’s response to a recent article in Science that claims to debunk irreducible complexity. File Date: 4.06.06.
• Comments on Ken Miller's Reply to My Essays
  January 8, 2001 commentary to Kenneth Miller, Brown University Professor of Biology and author of Finding Darwin's God, who posted a response to Behe's essays at: http://biocrs.biomed.brown.edu/Darwin/DI/Design.html. File Date: 2.26.01.
• Self-Organization and Irreducibly Complex Systems: A Reply to Shanks and Joplin
  August 31, 2000.
• Correspondence with Science Journals: Response to Critics Concerning Peer Review
  August 2, 2000.
• Philosophical Objections to Intelligent Design: Response to Critics
  July 31, 2000.
• "A True Acid Test": Response to Ken Miller
  July 31, 2000.
• In Defense of the Irreducibility of the Blood Clotting Cascade: Response to Russell Doolittle, Ken Miller, and Keith Robison
  July 31, 2000.
• Irreducible Complexity and the Evolutionary Literature: Response to Critics
  July 31, 2000.
• A Mousetrap Defended: Response to Critics
  July 31, 2000.
• Intelligent Design is Not Creationism: Response to "Not (Just) in Kansas Anymore" by Eugenie C. Scott, Science (May 2000)
  July 7, 2000.
• Behe Responds to Boston Review
  The December 1996/ January 1997 issue of the Boston Review carried a discussion by H. Allen Orr of Michael Behe's book, Darwin's Black Box. These are the responses to that article. The response to the author was published by the BR's February/ March 1997 issue. The second response was sent to the reader discussion website of the Boston Review but was not published . We have also included links to Mr. Orr's original article and his subsequent response to Behe.

• Response to the Author
• Response to the Publication

• Response to Talk Origins Criticism
  October 16, 1996 reply to Keith Robison and Tim Ikelda, in reponse to a series of postings in the Talk Origins Newsgroup.

[Kenny Bunkport]

From your comment, it would be accurate to assume you've read both the original edition, and this new addition as well?