Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: altura
As far as being a copout, I don't get your point.

I think women priests are fine.

OK. I actually hadn't considered that you were in favor of women's ordination. In that case it's not a copout, but it is a grave error.

To be a woman is not inherently sinful--that's stupid.

I don't think anyone's advancing that position; however, they still should not be priests.

I don't think homosexuality is a sin, but I don't think it's an excuse for sinful behavior.

I don't know how to follow-up this statement, since it seems we're on different wavelengths as it involves moraility, but if homosexuality is not sinful, how can any homosexual acts be sinful?
15 posted on 04/01/2006 2:04:39 PM PST by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Conservative til I die

Let me 'splain it to you.

A homosexual who is celibate is not engaging in sinful behavior.

A homosexual who is not promiscuous but committed to one partner...I can't find that sinful.

A homosexual who commits adultery on his wife, leaves his wife and family and takes up an affair with another man is sinful, but it would also be sinful if the affair was with another woman.


18 posted on 04/01/2006 5:32:53 PM PST by altura (A proud member of the 45 percent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson