Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: murphE; P-Marlowe
I vote for intentionally obtuse.

Either that or he is now denying the Divinity of Jesus. You never know.

SD

179 posted on 03/24/2006 2:37:38 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: All

Hint: be respectful to other others.


181 posted on 03/24/2006 2:39:32 PM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

To: SoothingDave; murphE; irishtenor; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; HarleyD
I vote for intentionally obtuse. Either that or he is now denying the Divinity of Jesus. You never know.

Are you saying that Jesus only "appeared to be" human? Or was he fully human?

It seems that Mrs. Murphy is of the opinion that Jesus' humanity was merely an illusion. Kinda like the accidents and appearances, i.e., that Jesus appeared to be human to our senses but that he was actually only Deity.

Using that analogy, then you could not argue for the actual presence of Christ's flesh in the Eucharist, since Christ's actual flesh was merely an accident and appearance of his divinity.

So what is it? Was Jesus human? Or was his humanity merely an illusion?

185 posted on 03/24/2006 2:56:53 PM PST by P-Marlowe (((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson