Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alex Murphy
What a surprise - The wafer was consecrated, but transubstantiation didn't take place. It's still a wafer.

What do you think "transubstantiation" means? What does the doctrine teach us about the observable aspects (i.e. the apearances) of the communion elements?

SD

14 posted on 03/24/2006 8:00:21 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave; Alex Murphy
What does the doctrine teach us about the observable aspects (i.e. the apearances) of the communion elements?

It teaches us that there are a lot of doctrines in the Catholic Church that are just... not... biblical.

I do find it interesting that so many Catholics are willing to accept the accidents and appearances as fact in regard to the communion, but when it comes to believing that the Earth was created in 6 days, they scoff at the creationist "whackjobs" who actually believe that "despite all appearances to the contrary" that God really did create the heavens and the earth in 6 days.

On the one hand they deny all natural observations to the contrary and insist that what they are consuming is the "literal" flesh and blood of Jesus Christ, yet they scoff at anyone who takes Genesis literally and actually believes that the earth is much younger than it appears.

If "accidents and appearances" can explain the eucharist, then why can't it explain the creation?

16 posted on 03/24/2006 8:09:24 AM PST by P-Marlowe (((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson