Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Hermann the Cherusker

It is difficult to argue with Traditionalists because their arguments are inconsistent and illogical. Moreover, they disagree among themselves on many issues, including the validity of the 1962 missal, whether the see of Rome is vacant, etc. ad nauseum. If only it were possible to learn what the position of the traditionalists actually is.


18 posted on 03/23/2006 8:33:15 AM PST by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: steadfastconservative

"It is difficult to argue with Traditionalists because their arguments are inconsistent and illogical."

Ok, I'll bite; give me ONE argument inconsistant/illogical.


20 posted on 03/23/2006 10:21:00 AM PST by Daffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: steadfastconservative
It is difficult to argue with Traditionalists because their arguments are inconsistent and illogical. Moreover, they disagree among themselves on many issues,

Really, I find that true about the neo-Caths, do they believe in birth control or not? Do they believe in the real presence or not? Is it okay for nuns to do homilies or not? Are clown Masses acceptable liturgy or not? If only it were possible to learn what the position of the neo-Catholics actually is.

21 posted on 03/23/2006 10:35:33 AM PST by TradicalRC (No longer to the right of the Pope...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson