Posted on 03/20/2006 7:50:53 PM PST by NYCCatholic
All I can say is: Please don't wait till October!!!!!
Since we're not allowed to use the "A" word during Lent, how about Laus tibi, Domine, Rex aeternae gloriae?
By the way, memo to one poster whose name I forget: the Pope is Benedict, not Gregory.
And isn't it amazing how converts, God love them and we all welcome them = but why do they waste time tracking down gossip about various people in and out of the Vatican and then violate charity by posting it?
If Mass is not made into a theatrical performance, there won't be applause.
This applies equally to those who want to see Opera House Mozart Masses performed in the Old Rite as to those who make the Novus Ordo into a stage act.
Well said. The simple joy of a Low Mass devoutly celebrated according to the 1962 Missale Romanum is unequalled.
Isn't that the sorry truth!
I think he should mandate these changes, but first he should mandate studies for all of the priests in the Church - one year of liturgical Latin with study of the Old Mass to give modern priests a better foundation in tradition, combined with an introduction to chant and Catholic music and art.
Very sound, solid, and sensible approach. I hope we see this in the near future. I wonder if today's "current" priests would be required to go back and learn (and/or review) these studies...kind of like "continuing education?"
And he should do it in such a way that any bishop who refuses to obey should have to go out and find himself a job flipping burgers at McDonald's to pay for his retirement.
Love it! LOL
Oh quit it with that common sense.
However, there's one other thing which I'm looking for which will really show that the counter-revolution has begun in earnest and that is to turn the priest around and make him face away from the people and toward Jesus in the tabernacle. That one thing alone would do more to cripple the "I'm an entertainer" mentality so common among today's priests, than anything else of which I can think.
Huzzah!!!!
as well as the elimination of instruments that are inadequate for liturgical use, such as the electric guitar or drums, although it is not likely that specific instruments will be mentioned.
Better be specific, Your Holiness. Give the "liturgists" a nanometer, and they'll take a lightyear.
Here's new St. Helena's, one of several beautiful new parishes recently erected in the diocese.
Agreed. And I also see no reason why the Confiteor be left out period each week by a number of priests where I (occasionally) attend the N.O.
Or, is there a reason many will do this?
You said it, siunevada!
If we are The Chuch Universal (and I know I'll get flamed for this) why are we not praying with each other in common language (aka the language of the Church)?
The excuse they'll give you: the responses of "Lord have mercy, Christ have mercy, Lord have mercy" adequately express penitence and therefore the Confiteor is unnecessary.
And instead of the Preface, I should have said the Sanctus. Perhaps both.
Actually, the point was NOT to face Jesus in the tabernacle (remember, in many very old and/or famous churches - in St Peter's Basilica, for instance - there is not and never was a tabernacle on the high altar), but to face East (even when a particular parish church did not really face east, the orientation of the altar was called "liturgical East").
The best current discussion/explanation of this is in Cardinal Ratzinger's THE SPIRIT OF THE LITURGY (chapter 3: The Altar and the Direction of Liturgy Prayer, pp 74-84). That chapter is essential reading for presenting the theological/liturgical reasons in favor of the practice.
But your conclusion is absolutely correct: that would go toward about 90% of eliminating the sorry spectacle of Mass as "The Father X Show".
Of course, as long as anything is in the vernacular, some priests will not be able to resist the temptation to "ad lib" - and that's the other factor that fuels "Mass as Entertainment".
It has been said that the new Mass - rightly or wrongly - was put together by a commission of academics and monastics. Academics know enough to know what they don't know, so they would not be inclined to ad lib. Monastics are trained in the self-effacement of communal life in which the Holy Rule and the customary of the house - not one's personal whim or supposed wisdom - determine what one does and doesn't do, down to the least detail. THEY might actually OBSERVE an Order of Mass.
The average priest in the parish, neither an academic nor a monastic, faced with and facing the people feels (or sadly has) the need to "communicate" with them - and he's fluent (more of less!) in the language - so ad-lib away!
Anyhow, read Cardinal Ratzinger for an eloquent presentation of the rationale behind East-ward facing liturgy.
Eeek.
I wonder just how many people who attend Mass, where this is (sometimes unknowingly) omitted, think that:
(in my own short form) "I confess that I have sinned exceedingly in thought, word and deed through my fault...ect...and ask the Saints to pray for me"...
Is really "old fashioned?"
Nice "assumption" on the liturgical directors part, doncha think?
Wow.
I saw a film last weekend called "Joyeux Noel" about the WWI Christmas ceasefire on the Western front. One scene included the French, German and Scottish soldiers attending an outdoor Mass, it was particularly enlightening and edifying to see them respond in unison "Et Cum Espiritu Tuo"....because the they all understood the language of the Mass.
The vernacular is all well and good, but for unity's sake more Latin trumps that.
You do realize that at a TLM, the epistle and gospel are generally re-read by the priest in the vernacular before the sermon, so this should not be an issue.
I've also been to one TLM in recent memory (not in the USA) and there was definitely no reading of the Epistle and Gospel in the vernacular.
Is that a general thing in the US now??
The Catholics are johnny-come-latelies in THIS line -- there's a church in London that's been doing it for YEARS.
I guess I cannot say what is the "general thing" in the US, or anywhere else, because my experience is limited. I may have been making an error by assuming my experience is general. And, I have no memory of the TLM before the council - I was born after it closed. =D
thanks for posting the pics of st. helenas. I would have to disagree though that not all the new churches that have sprung up in the philly archdiocese are 'beautifull'.
Saint Anthony of Padua, although nice is lacking in some things. nameley the statues of the blessed mother and saint Joseph. I understand Mongignor did not want those there.
Also - they adore the happy clappy crap there every sunday as well.
Corpus Christi is kind of modern looking too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.