Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: redgolum

>> If by the "Q" school, you mean literary critcism, remember that there are many Roman Catholic apologists who have embraced it. <<

Yes, they did, and for that reason I spoke of the German-speaking culture, and not of Lutherans. Heidegger is also embraced by many Catholics. My point was only that the intellectual movements were related, not that the error of the "Q" school is a necessary conclusion of Lutherism.

>> Luther did hint at various things he saw in seminary, and his out right shock at what he saw in Rome of the time. <<

You do realize that historians, Catholic, secular, and Protestant, highly doubt Luther's claims of Rome, as they were very inconsistent with better-established histories. For instance, most of the funds that the Catholic church was raising was being spent on fighting Islam, not on the wealth and splendor he relates. On the other hand, it is possible that he was merely exaggerating; certainly, Rome at the time was spending significant amounts on very majestic material things such as St. Peter's. (Not purely materialist, since the subjects were chosen to glorify Christ and proclaim that such matters were what the church found worthy of exaltation; nonetheless, I must concede a substantial amount of materialist corruption.)

I recognize what you say about having to go to work; I am feeling quite prolific on FR this afternoon... Must be maintaining 50 WPM with gusts to hurricane forces :^D... I'll look forward to reading more...


164 posted on 03/20/2006 2:09:04 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

Comment:
Again, note I refer to "Lutherism," and not "Lutheranism" to include Protestants who subscribe to Luther's teachings but are not members of sects which describe themselves as Lutheran.


167 posted on 03/20/2006 2:22:02 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

To: dangus
One more thing before I head home.

I was referencing Luther's reaction to the worldly court he saw at Rome, not the vast building projects. He was scandalized more by the irreverent priests, prostitutes openly soliciting priests (and getting clients!) and the general lack of reverence present in Rome at the time. Luther was very excited to see Rome, and left very downtrodden. His fellow companion on the trip, who had been to Rome before, had tried to warn Luther of what it was like before hand, but he was still shocked.

The problems he had with the building projects came later during the indulgence scandals. That was because many people viewed the buying of the indulgence as a license to sin (which it was not, but many sellers didn't correct the impression).
174 posted on 03/20/2006 3:24:14 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson