Do you agree or disagree with that definition?
I think the definitions are beside the point, the problem is not the raw basic pincibles darwin put forth, the problem is that in the classroom athiests put forth their faith, and use darwinism to describe creation and say that God is an impossibility. Further Darwinism is hardly integral to getting a good job, I think it should be saved to the college level where specialists and those less impressionable can be exposed to it at their will not because it is impossible for children to make up their own mind but because it is too easy for them to be impressionable and for the iressponible to use the classroom as a forum to preach athiesm.
Similarly I do not think open homosexuals should teach children. Children are impressionable and adults with power over them can coerce instead of educate.