Replies

Just wondering if you also were looking for the same answers from Full Court, as I've tried to get them for some time now.

You must be aware I've given up on Full Court. She is very open in her insistence that her interpretation is the one and only correct one. I suspect you, on the other hand, merely pretends to be open minded. You are just as fixed on your "not blood brother" position as she is on hers but, for some reason you are silent on the real reason.

I am not persuaded by anything that has been offered as proof to change my well-decided opinion. Largely because nothing has been offered except the repetition of the verses in English. I have rejected the arguments offered after examining them.

Face it, Mother Church has spoken and you are not allowed to think differently. I believe your "openness" is nothing but a bluff - so there!

I do not think the other side can honestly say that.

Am I on this "other side"? I actualy think Jesus did have blood brothers and sisters but cannot find absoloute proof in our current day Bible(s). Further, I don't think it makes any difference except to those of you who are locked into a position which, despite your protestation of open mindendness, cannot change unless you are prepared to become an "ex".

Am I on this "other side"? I actualy think Jesus did have blood brothers and sisters but cannot find absoloute proof in our current day Bible(s).

You're actually a voice of moderation here, at least on the issue of what the Bible does and does not say on this issue.

How about that?