Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wmfights
Unfortunely our Roman Catholic posters are not as open.

Which side is it that is examining the text, looking into the history of the peoples of the region, delving into the original languages and making the argument that linguistically either interpretation is valid, but that tradition and other textual evidence points to our interpretation?

And which side keeps posting the same quotes over and over, as if our problem is in reading English and refuses to engage in discussion about the language used and other possible interpretations?

And which one do you call "open"?

It'd be hilarious if you weren't serious.

SD

1,917 posted on 02/27/2006 6:37:10 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1884 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave; wmfights
And which side keeps posting the same quotes over and over, as if our problem is in reading English and refuses to engage in discussion about the language used and other possible interpretations?

Dave, I posted the Greek. It means sex between a man and a woman. Now why you want to claim I am not looking at it fully it not true.

1,957 posted on 02/27/2006 9:41:40 AM PST by Full Court (Keepers at home, do you think it's optional?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1917 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson