Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Full Court

So? Mary was his mother. He had a group of relatives there, that many of us, including people from early days of the church believe were the children of Joseph and a first wife. This is the early belief of the church, btw. It is still the major belief of the Orthodox church, I believe.

If Mary had had other children, Jesus would not have given her into John's keeping.

If Jesus had had younger brothers and sisters, they wouldn't have dared try to come up and take him away because they were worried about his mental health. One did NOT treat the elder brother of a family that way. But one certainly wouldn't have problems treating the child of your stepmother that way, if you were worried about him or you thought he was embarrassing the family.

Nothing in that bible passage requires these to be the children of Mary. Only the children of Joesph or Jesus' kinsmen.

Sometimes, we have to just to agree to disagree on that point, then move on to something else that will help us both grow as Christians.

God bless.


1,798 posted on 02/25/2006 8:23:16 PM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1797 | View Replies ]


To: Knitting A Conundrum; Cronos; InterestedQuestioner; Full Court; wmfights; annalex; SoothingDave; ...
If Mary had had other children, Jesus would not have given her into John's keeping.

There is nothing in Scripture to tell us that. Yet there is plenty that tells us that Mary and Joseph had sex and had other children.

Why would any of you reject the clear teaching of God's Word?

1,836 posted on 02/26/2006 10:01:28 AM PST by Full Court (Keepers at home, do you think it's optional?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1798 | View Replies ]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
He had a group of relatives there, that many of us, including people from early days of the church believe were the children of Joseph and a first wife.

If that were true, those children would of been with them on the trip to Bethlhem and they were not.

So there were no children from some fictional first wife.

1,842 posted on 02/26/2006 10:24:23 AM PST by Full Court (Keepers at home, do you think it's optional?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1798 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson