To: Full Court
Nothing you have posted here states that Scripture is sufficient or the end-all be-all of Christian faith.
In actuality, you spoil your whole argument as the verses you cite due say that Scripture is "profitable" for teaching, correction, etc.
It is also "profitable" in helping to make the man of God perfect and able to do good works.
Sounds to me that Scripture is used as a means to an end, rather than being the end itself.
But *you* can feel free to reject what God's Scriptures say. *Your* soul is the one in peril should you decide to do so.
To: Conservative til I die; Full Court
In actuality, you spoil your whole argument as the verses you cite due say that Scripture is "profitable" for teaching, correction, etc.
Are you choosing to ignore the following verse?
17: that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
What does "complete" mean to you?
But *you* can feel free to reject what God's Scriptures say. *Your* soul is the one in peril should you decide to do so.
Do you think it's about time for both Full Court and you to stop passing judgement on each other?
1,698 posted on
02/25/2006 12:39:03 PM PST by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: Conservative til I die; Full Court
In actuality, you spoil your whole argument as the verses you cite due say that Scripture is "profitable" for teaching, correction, etc.
Are you choosing to ignore the following verse?
17: that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
What does "complete" mean to you?
But *you* can feel free to reject what God's Scriptures say. *Your* soul is the one in peril should you decide to do so.
Do you think it's about time for both Full Court and you to stop passing judgement on each other?
1,699 posted on
02/25/2006 12:39:58 PM PST by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson