To: Full Court
It's not for "relegion." It's for the Lord Jesus Christ against a bunch of catholics who would rather call Jesus a sinner than admit that the Word of God clearly shows that Jesus Christ had brothers and sisters.
Knowing that you are not an ignorant person, I will have to kindly ask you to retract your intentionally false (i.e., a lie) statement that indicates that Catholics call Jesus a sinner.
You know darned well that the point being made was that Jesus had no brothers or sister because if He did, He would have been committing a sin by handing over care of His mother to John, a non-relative. Of course, we Catholics believe Christ was never a sinner of any sort, hence, He could not have had brothers and sisters.
Might I add, you are providing an extremely poor Christian witness to others (not just us hardcore Catholics) if you have to resort to distortions and perversions of the truth.
To: Conservative til I die
the point being made was that Jesus had no brothers or sister because if He did, He would have been committing a sin by handing over care of His mother to John, a non-relative. No where in Scripture can you find that false teaching. And the point remains that you and those who expose that false teachings would rather claim that Jesus would be sinning than accept the clear teaching of Scripture that..
1. Mary had sex with Joseph.
2. Jesus had brothers and sisters.
Why is your priority Mary instead of Jesus?
1,672 posted on
02/25/2006 11:04:18 AM PST by
Full Court
(Keepers at home, do you think it's optional?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson