Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Full Court
Clearly the idea that "brother" among the Semitic peoples can only mean male siblings from the same uterus is wrong.

God uses the word cousin when He means cousin.

Gen 14:12And they took Lot, Abram's brother's son, who dwelt in Sodom, and his goods, and departed.
13And there came one that had escaped, and told Abram the Hebrew; for he dwelt in the plain of Mamre the Amorite, brother of Eshcol, and brother of Aner: and these were confederate with Abram.
14And when Abram heard that his brother was taken captive, he armed his trained servants, born in his own house, three hundred and eighteen, and pursued them unto Dan.

So God could have said Lot was Abram's nephew, but used "brother" because God was in error when He inspired this Scripture?

Why do you even pretend to be engaging in a reasoned debate, why the farce that you are a Biblical defender when you brazenly ignore Scripture when it is posted to you.

Dave, your soul is in great peril.

I'll take that under advisement. Just as soon as you address the arguments presented in 1348, and 1602. Why do you shrink from discussing the Bible?

SD

1,646 posted on 02/24/2006 8:36:06 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1619 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave

By the way, I've never seen you post at 8:30 in the evening. :-)


1,655 posted on 02/25/2006 8:19:05 AM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1646 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson