Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: InterestedQuestioner

The simplest explanation is in placing the "call no man father" in its historical context as well as literal context. Since Christ is talking about calling men masters and teachers as well as fathers, He is referring to the honorifics given various rabbis of His time, who had devoted followers. They had cadres of followers that belonged to "houses" and the rabbi would be called a "father" of that "house". The warning is then not to follow sectarian teachers, like we sometime do our parents, blindly, to the point that the unity of faith is fractured.

Clearly, we have numerous references to fathers, teachers and masters in the New Testament, so the prohibition in Matthew 23 was taken but allegorically by the inspired authors.


1,526 posted on 02/23/2006 4:50:49 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1521 | View Replies ]


To: annalex
The simplest explanation is in placing the "call no man father" in its historical context as well as literal context. Since Christ is talking about calling men masters and teachers as well as fathers, He is referring to the honorifics given various rabbis of His time, who had devoted followers. They had cadres of followers that belonged to "houses" and the rabbi would be called a "father" of that "house". The warning is then not to follow sectarian teachers, like we sometime do our parents, blindly, to the point that the unity of faith is fractured.


1,527 posted on 02/23/2006 5:25:09 PM PST by gscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1526 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson