Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sionnsar

"The congregation's claim on the property of St. Church is Luke's clearly illegal according to the canons of our diocese and the national Church and to the laws of the State of California. It is my pastoral and fiduciary duty to this diocese to protect its property rights, and we will pursue this matter."

Rt. Rev. Bruno has already lost on this issue in the California courts.


10 posted on 02/14/2006 9:19:33 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kaehurowing; Kolokotronis
Yes, he has. There is also this, which I'n not lawyer enough to understand but it is unusual and might imply that Bruno has even less a leg to stand on in this case:

St. Luke’s has been a separate, California nonprofit religious corporation since 1940, and it will continue to hold worship services in La Crescenta.

11 posted on 02/14/2006 10:56:35 PM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Libs: Celebrate MY diversity! | Iran Azadi 2006 | Is it March yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson