Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
It isn't that it is forbidden to ordain women, or for women to perform the sacramental functions.

we are on the same page, brother. Sorry for the confusion and lack of precision. I thought my first post was clear enough to show that women were physically capable of performing the rite, but sacramentally, nothing would happen, since Christ chose not to come as a woman and the celebrant is supposed to be acting "in the person of Christ". God COULD have chosen to come as a woman, OR COULD HAVE chosen to make His Presence known through broccoli. The fact is that He didn't. The sign is supposed to carry out what is symbolizes.

Regards

38 posted on 02/09/2006 8:39:11 AM PST by jo kus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: jo kus

Dear jo kus,

Okay, thanks.

Again, I apologize if I came on strong or too hard.

There are a lot of folks running around who are not accurately representing the position of the Church, characterizing the teaching that although ordination of women is FORBIDDEN (even rightly so), it is not impossible. Even my old pastor, who was an otherwise pretty orthodox fellow, didn't understand the difference. To that is what I was responding.


sitetest


39 posted on 02/09/2006 8:47:23 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson