Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: conservonator; jo kus

Dear conservonator,

Well, if that was what jo kus was saying, then it was unclear to me. However, I could just be dense. ;-)

In that case, I offer my comment as explanation for the equally dense.

Ontologically, a woman is not capable of executing the sacraments save baptism.


sitetest


17 posted on 02/08/2006 7:42:56 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest
Ontologically, a woman is not capable of executing the sacraments save baptism.

Agreed.

21 posted on 02/08/2006 9:57:21 AM PST by conservonator (Pray for those suffering)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: sitetest; conservonator
Well, if that was what jo kus was saying, then it was unclear to me. However, I could just be dense. ;-)

You jumped on me a bit quickly. My "however" in the very next sentence explained what all three of us agree on - women cannot celebrate the sacraments - not because of the superior abilities of men, but because Jesus was not a woman. It's a sacramental thing.

Regards

22 posted on 02/08/2006 11:10:16 AM PST by jo kus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson