Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Rutles4Ever
Correct, but not the first accepted definition. Your use of the word "falsehood", as can be ascertained by your posts, infers a will to deceive.

Doesn't matter if its the first. The second one is also acceptable.

There's no will to deceive, just a blatant misunderstanding on my part which I'm willing to admit. The first accepted definition of "misunderstanding" is appropriate here. The choice of "falsehood" is accusatory.

I never thoght you were lying in the first place. So now if you'll refrain from judging my motives we'll be even. But if you can't bring yourself to do that its no skin of my teeth.

579 posted on 02/10/2006 7:49:18 AM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies ]


To: Invincibly Ignorant

Even.


580 posted on 02/10/2006 7:56:20 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson