Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: haole
At what point was the "Church" commanded though to follow Peter?
They weren't.

But I am not going to get back into this debate. Please feel free to believe as you will, as for my beliefs if they are wrong the Lord will show me. Once again I will say, I am done here.
337 posted on 02/07/2006 7:09:47 PM PST by whispering out loud (the bible is either 100% true, or in it's very nature it is 100% a lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]


To: whispering out loud
At what point was the "Church" commanded though to follow Peter?

I know you said you're done here more than once but please take just one more moment to consider something.

From early in the OT (in fact, first promised to Abraham), God promised an everlasting kingship out of Israel over the whole world. Later, that kingdom is defined as on the order of King David.

When Solomon assumed the throne after David, the first things he did were to enthrone his own mother as the queen mother to hear the supplications of his people and established his ministers. If I could point you to chapter and verse, I would but I don't know them off the top of my head. What you will find, if you take the time, in the institution of the Prime Minister is nearly the exact wording Jesus said to Peter of binding and loosing and the symbol of his authority were the keys to the kingdom.

The Catholic Church is very consistent in its interpretation of Peter's office and responsibility. If Jesus is a king of the Davidic line it isn't unreasonable to see His institutional words as they were understood through Solomon's wisdom.

372 posted on 02/08/2006 6:48:55 AM PST by pgyanke (Christ has a tolerance for sinners; liberals have a tolerance for sin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson