Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

True. The very conservative Bishops Keating and Walsh of Arlington, VA never allowed an indult Mass; Bishop Loverde is very stingy with it. The late Cardinal Hickey of Washington, although with a slightly less 'conservative' reputation than Bishop Keating, established a Latin Mass parish. Cardinal McCarrick (not a terrible Bishop, but not the greatest reputation for being 'conservative') has maintained it. Uncle Wally was willing to let people do just about anything.


8 posted on 02/02/2006 2:12:35 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: ArrogantBustard

Cummins had a terrible reputation on homosexual and liturgical issues (his diocese had the infamous "clown Mass"), but for some reason, he allowed a traditonal Mass in Oakland. Archbishop Levada would not allow it at all, wouldn't even hear of it. I can only imagine his input into the current negotiations about the Mass.


10 posted on 02/02/2006 2:58:35 PM PST by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: ArrogantBustard

Dear ArrogantBustard,

I'll add to your commentary about Washington that under Cardinal Hickey, three Indult Masses were established, and have been maintained (at least the last time I checked) by Cardinal McCarrick.


sitetest


11 posted on 02/02/2006 3:09:14 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson