Replies

here's the fact, every evolutionist I've spoken to has abandoned the "Scientific method" which is the very basis of science. Science and religion can coexist, and evo is a theory nothing more, and a weakly based one at that. It is supported only by theories based upon fossils that themselves are bathed in theory. These fossils are supposed to be hundreds of thousands of years old when in fact if you trace back population growth charts and do the math on the curve of the growth of population the species dwindles to nothing somewhere between 11000, and 17000 years ago. Also if you look at these fossils, what I see is people, or apes, whichever the case may be with disfigurements. Are disfigured people of today actually steps in the evolutionary process? Then there's the methods of "dating" these fossils, according to the very method upon which science is based, there must be a constant, and a variable to prove a method , and the method could only be proved as far as the constant can be monitored. Now you tell me, was there a scientist around 100000 years ago keeping records on these fossils, or the constants they use to prove these dating methods? I think not, so in essence they have no way to prove age that can be tested any farther back than probably around a couple thousand years, a far cry from hundreds of thousands, or even millions. But then I'm just an ignorant Christian who would rather believe that this world is far to complex and ordered to have been left to chance, and a roll of the dice. And that's just the way I see it :)