Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Zionist Conspirator
Will you kindly explain to me why a religion that believes in being zapped by demons is so scientific and naturalistic when it comes not only to the origins of the world but to the origins of the Biblical text?

Because the God of science is the God of the Bible and the God of Truth. Truth cannot contradict truth. Any apparent contradiction between the two must be just that.

The Church allows very wide latitude in the interpretation of Genesis (and biblical interpretation generally), ranging from a literal interpretation to a very figurative one, because neither science nor biblical exegesis is conclusive. The core truths that Catholics must hold regarding Genesis are the doctrines of creation from nothing, Original Sin, and with almost as high a degree of certainty, its logical corollary, the existence of original parents of the human race.

Regarding alleged cases of possession, the Church recommends first medical examination, and then, once medical explanations of physical phenomena have been found inadequate, exorcism.

17 posted on 01/27/2006 10:28:23 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Aquinasfan; Campion; wideawake
Because the God of science is the God of the Bible and the God of Truth. Truth cannot contradict truth. Any apparent contradiction between the two must be just that.

I wish one of you "unity of truth" people (who always wind up making a radical division between "scientific truth" and "literal truth") would explain to me why when an "apparent contradiction" occurs it is the uniformitarian scientific explanations that must always be accepted as "what actually happened" while the Biblical account must always be relegated to didactic parable. Is it not ever possible that the uniformitarian scientific assumption must yield?

The Church allows very wide latitude in the interpretation of Genesis (and biblical interpretation generally), ranging from a literal interpretation to a very figurative one, because neither science nor biblical exegesis is conclusive.

You mean the "universal consent of the Fathers" isn't definitive? How many liberal theories must Catholics sift through in order to arrive at a "conclusion?"

The core truths that Catholics must hold regarding Genesis are the doctrines of creation from nothing, Original Sin, and with almost as high a degree of certainty, its logical corollary, the existence of original parents of the human race.

I note your refusal to deal with the issue of hypocrisy in defending Catholic traditions while subjecting the Jewish traditions that delivered the Bible to you to scientific criticism. Isn't this precisely the attitude of Protestants who accept the "Catholic" Bible while rejecting Catholic traditions about it?

BTW, at which point in Genesis do its characters suddenly cease to be mythical and become historical? I assume after Chapter 11?

18 posted on 01/27/2006 11:39:08 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Shallach 'et `ammi veya`avduni!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Aquinasfan
BTW, with such an attitude towards the Bible, why do you object to the documentary hypothesis in the first place? I thought "truth cannot contradict truth?" Maybe the stupid Church Fathers were as ignorant about the Bible as they were about natural science and must step aside to What We Now Know?

I hope the Catholic Church will be equally willing to place all its teachings in the dock of science and modernity, however, and not just the Bible.

19 posted on 01/27/2006 11:57:31 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Shallach 'et `ammi veya`avduni!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson