I think the best answer to this was as cardinal Pell said: the priest is to image Christ, and Jesus did not marry.
An unmarried man can give completely of himself for his flock and as St Paul says the married man will have a divided mind. Still, it is admitted the the discipline could change, but ultimately it could cause worse problems than it would solve.
What I found was that sincere Catholics - who really wanted to be considered "orthodox" accepted their position as though it were the only legitimate Catholic position because it was found in Crisis Magazine (or in the other periodical associated with the pro-war position, the more intellectually oriented "First Things") and as if it was the only "orthodox" position without actually thinking the issue through and examining it for themselves. I do not want to see that happen on this issue.
*Readers ought be alerted to the backdrop for this piece.
TCR is the website of Steven Hand. Mr. Hand has been egregiously ugly and defamatory in debates with orthodox Catholics over his, Mr. Hand's, personal opinions about the Justness of this war. Hand is against it and makes innumerable unsupportable claims his personal opinion is the Pope's official position. He has alienated many with his crazy and angry assertions and several have, publicly, repudiated and severed all contact with him until he apologizes.
In addition, Mr. Hand has long advocated a married priesthood.
That said, IMO, all inertia is in the direction of maintaining The Apostolic Origins of Priestly Celibacy which just happens to be an invaluable text written by FR. Christian Cochini