[Buggman]

It did happen, and instead of simply writing counter-articles, the evo-inquisition pitched a hissy fit and ruined Richard Sternberg's career for his daring to allow a peer-reviewed article by Stephen Meyer supporting ID to appear in the pages of the Smithsonian, never mind that it passed all the standard hurdles for publication.

One almost has to admire that level of chutzpah in hypocrisy: Demand that IDers publish peer-review articles, then ruin the careers of those who publish them, thus guarunteeing that no such articles will ever be published.

The day that happened, the evos forever surrendered their scientific "high ground" and put themselves in the position of ardent religionists defending a dogma.

Congratulations.

[BlackElk]

OOOOHHHH! I want you on my team in the coming war!

[hispanichoosier]

Look, one thing that neither evolution or ID can provide is a re-creation to support either theory or hypothesis. In other words, there's simply no way either theory or hypothesis can be proven true or false given the span of time we're dealing with in the geological record. If there is a way to do so, I'd love to hear it.