If my garlic-clove pasta is not science, then science is not the search for truth (or good eating), and is therefore not science (nor good eating)....
Re-reading your post, I discover that you referenced "garlic-clove pasta" not "garlic-clove pizza." This description is not as abominable as "garlic clove pizza" but somewhat abominable nonetheless. I entertained with the previous paragraph and I am leaving it as is. While "de gustibus non disputandum est" is a sensible standard, there are so very many pasta dishes more suitable and admirably complex than "garlic clove pasta." Secular humanist obsessives are often too obsessed with, well, secular humanism, to appreciate such as Coquilles St. Jacques, Oysters Anton, Chateaubriand (French cuisine is actually the reason why God and not some big bang created France and why we have to tolerate the likes of Chirac and de Villepin. French chefs predominate in the banquet halls and cafeteias of heaven).
French cuisine is genuine science and well worth pursuing as opposed to Darwinian mythology. Where Darwin may be found nowadays, the cuisine is boiled everything (with the exception of permaroast Darwin and friends) without condiments, if you get my drift.
Given your preferences in cuisine, small wonder that you are so confused about more complex matters as to side with Darwin and P.S. 666 over God Almighty. Whatever that confusion may be, it is NOT science or a search for Truth, the pretensions of the secular humanists and the culinarily unimaginative notwithstanding.
Do you REALLY want a contest in smart-ass????