Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Blzbba
"Certainly you've heard of 'figures of speech'.

Surprise ... the Bible uses them.

I'll bet you do too. "


You're right - I do. I also agree that these are figures of speech. Therefore, the Bible can't be taken as literal fact, since there are many instances of "figures of speech", as you pointed out.


So ... because you admit to using 'figures of speech', ... we should assume that you are never speaking 'literally' ?

171 posted on 01/20/2006 8:11:06 AM PST by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: Quester

"So ... because you admit to using 'figures of speech', ... we should assume that you are never speaking 'literally' ? "


Substitute "never" with "not always" and you're correct.


173 posted on 01/20/2006 8:15:14 AM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson