Skip to comments.
Indulgences: Spreading the Wealth
Homiletic & Pastoral Review ^
| November 2000
| Dermott J. Mullan
Posted on 01/17/2006 3:55:48 PM PST by annalex
An indulgence is an action of the Church which spreads her treasure of merits to the suffering members of the family of God.
Indulgences: Spreading the wealth
By Dermott J. Mullan
I. Introduction
Indulgences have to do with how God handles evil and good. To God, sin is always horrible, but humans do not always think so. The Churchs teaching on indulgences is meant to impress on us some of Gods horror of sin. The Church says sin is never an isolated event: rather, each sin has after-effects, not only in the person who sins but also in other parts of creation. Some of these after-effects are long-lived, and cannot be removed merely by going to Confession. But another side of the Churchs teaching on indulgences is that good deeds also have after-effects. And God deals with the after-effects of evil and the after-effects of good in different ways: the after-effects of good are much longer lived than the effects of sin. These aspects of the Churchs teaching are meant to open our minds to the wonder of belonging to the growing family of God.
II. The Family of God: who are our siblings?
At a babys baptism, the priest invites all present to pray the Our Father together so that the child will one day learn the highest duty of the baptized, to call on God as Father in the midst of the Church. This phrase reminds us that all baptized people share the same Father, and we remember this most vividly at Mass. Everyone we see around us at Mass calls the same person Father: He is not just my Father, but our Father. We are all part of one family, the family of God. Now a family is a place where we feel most at home. On major celebrations, it is Natural to come back home, to gather with parents, brothers and sisters. At times, there may also be members of other generations of the family, such as cousins, aunts, uncles, and grandparents.
The family of God also has its celebrations: every Sunday is meant to be one. But in the family of God, there are no cousins, aunts, uncles, or grandparents: as the saying goes: God has no grand-children. We are all are called to be brothers and sisters. We first learn this from the other people we can see at Mass. But there are also many others who are truly our brothers and sisters: they live in the next parish, the next town, etc.
However, an unusual aspect of Gods family is this: we also have brothers and sisters whom we cannot see with our natural eyes. Some are centuries older than we are. Among our older siblings, some are a lot better children of our Father than we are. On the other hand, some of our older siblings are in a lot of pain, and have been suffering for a very long time.
Admittedly, it takes a lot more thought to recognize these invisible folk as siblings than it does for the people we see at Mass in our parish Church. It is not easy for human nature to grasp that someone who died centuries ago, such as St. Thomas Aquinas or St. Catherine of Siena, can really be considered as an older brother or sister. Yet that is what they are: they really do call on God as their Father in the midst of the same Church as we do. Compared with Thomas or Catherine, we who are alive today are mere babies in the family of God (no matter how sophisticated we may feel at times.)
III. Youngsters in the family
Children who happen to be at the end of a large family know how special it can be to have older siblings. This is especially true at Christmas or on a birthday. The older sibling may be earning amounts of money which to a child seem stupendous. And whereas the child may be able to spend only a few pennies on a present for the older sibling, the latter can provide expensive presents that set the childs eyes agog. Family life is strengthened when all members buy presents for on another, each contributing what he or she can afford. The same thing is true in Gods family. In Gods family, it also happens that some of our siblings are fabulously wealthy in the world of grace: but others of our siblings have gotten themselves into trouble, and have been tormented by serious pain in purgatory ever since they died. Indulgences are ways that our mother the Church has devised to enable her wealthiest children to share their fortune with the younger members of Gods Family (such as we), and for us (poor though we are) to share what we can with our older suffering siblings.
Why does it matter that we have older siblings in the family of God? Because of the sins we commit. In order o understand how valuable it is to have rich older siblings, we need to think about sin and its effects.
IV. Sin and its after-effects: 3 or 4 generations
Sin is a deliberate breaking of Gods law. Pope Paul VI, in his Apostolic Constitution on the Revision of Indulgences (1967), writes: The truth has been divinely revealed that sins are followed by punishments. Gods holiness and justice inflict them. Sins must be expiated. This must be done on this earth through the sorrows, miseries, and trials of this life and above all through death. Otherwise the expiation must be made in the next life through fire and torments or purifying punishments . . . . The reasons [for punishments] are that our souls need to be purified, the holiness of the moral order needs to be strengthened, and Gods glory must be restored to its full majesty . . . every sin upsets the universal order which God has established. Further, every sin does immense harm to the sinner himself and to the community of men. In the last sentence of the above quote, the Pope says that when I sin, there are two kinds of after-effects: (a) in myself, and (b) in the world around me. First, sin destroys grace in my soul, and will condemn me to eternal punishment (if the sin is mortal), and leaves me in a spiritually weakened state. Secondly, my sin creates, as it were, some real damage in Gods world: my sin creates something like a broken window in the edifice of human history which was never meant to be there. This weakness in myself, and the damage in creation, are two important after-effects of sin.
How far does the damage done by my sin spread out through creation? In the case of certain sins, the answer is obvious: drunkenness or infidelity or excessive gambling by a parent often lead to great suffering for innocent members of a family. But what about sins which have less obvious effects: how far do their effects go? God provides an answer, in startling terms: I, the LORD, your God, am a jealous God, inflicting punishment for their fathers wickedness on the children of those who hate me, down to the third and fourth generation (Exod. 20:5). This remarkable statement leaves no doubt as to how serious sin is in Gods eyes. Gods answer applies to all sins, even sins which seem to have no obvious effects on the innocent members of the family. It is a chilling thought that when I commit a sin, I may be condemning my children and (if I ever have any) my grand-children to serious consequences.
To remove sin and its after-effects requires several things. First, friendship with God must be restored, and amends must be made for offending his wisdom and goodness: this is done by a sincere conversion of mind in a good confession to a priest. Confession removes the guilt of sin, and also removes any condemnation to eternal punishment (if mortal sin was committed).
But what about the weakness in my soul, and the damage I did to Gods creation? How are they to be removed? Confession does not do it. Pope Paul teaches that there are two ways:
The first is by freely making reparation, which involves punishment. The second is by accepting the punishments Gods wisdom has appointed. . . . The very fact that punishment for sin exists, and that it is so severe, make it possible for us to understand how foolish and malicious sin is, and how harmful its consequences are.
The souls who are now in purgatory are those who died in the charity of God, were truly repentant, but who had not made satisfaction with adequate penance for their sins and omissions.
V. Goodness and its after-effects: 1000 generations
The necessity of doing penance for sins is apparent from the words of Our Lord: Unless you do penance, you shall all likewise perish (Luke 13: 3). But how do I know when I have done adequate penance for my sins? There is no obvious measuring stick to use: could it be that God is a taskmaster who is never satisfied? If this were true, it would be a heavy burden indeed. But there is good news for us precisely because we are members of Gods family. The fact is, some of our older siblings were so aware of how their sins had offended God, whom they loved, that they willingly suffered severe penances in order to repair the damage which they had done to Gods world. The Church teaches that these saints, by means of their penances, more than compensated for the damage their own sins had done.
This has a remarkable effect on us. We have already seen how God reacts to sin, and to people who hate Him. Now we ask: how does God react to people who love Him? Gods answer to this question is clear, startling and specific: I, the LORD, your God . . . bestow mercy down to the thousandth generation on the children of those who love me and keep my commandments (Exod. 20:6).
This must be regarded as one of the most remarkable statements in all of Scripture.
It says with clarity that God responds to love of him very differently from the way in which he responds to sin: although sin is by no means allowed to go unpunished, nevertheless, the punishments are felt for only three or four generations, whereas the effects of good last for a thousand generations, or essentially forever. In human terms, we may say that God rewards good deeds more than he punishes sin. God never forgets a good deed done by a person who loves him. The effects of sins peter out after a few generations (or as Psalm 1 says: the way of the wicked vanishes ), but God does not allow the effects of good deeds ever to fade away.
Now, some of our older siblings performed good deeds during their lives. In view of Exod. 20:6, we now recognize that God is still blessing those good deeds to this very day. Far from diminishing with the passing of the years, the amount of blessings has continued to swell as Gods family expands. The older the family of God becomes, the more loving deeds are performed, and the more the blessings accumulate. it is as if a tidal wave of blessings has been growing over time, getting larger and larger with each passing generation.
VI. The family of God comes of age
Pope Paul describes the treasury of the Church as including the infinite value which Our Lords merits have in the eyes of God our Father, as well as the prayers and good works of the Blessed Virgin Mary . . . . In the treasury too are the prayers and good works of all the saints . . . they attained their own salvation and at the same time cooperated in saving their brothers in the unity of the Mystical Body. Pope Paul admits that indulgences were not a widespread idea in the primitive Church. It took time for the doctrine to grow. The idea that pastors could set someone free of the after-effects of sin by applying the merits of Christ and of the saints grew up gradually in the Church over the centuries. The Church took time to realize that the after-effects of good deeds were building up as the years went on, growing like some sort of tidal wave of ever-increasing size.
If we can return to the analogy of the family, we see that this development makes sense. In a family, it takes some time before the parents can call on the older siblings to start to contribute to family life. For example, when a child reaches age 7-10, he/she can begin to help with raising the younger members and doing chores. And when he/she reaches age 15-20, financial contributions to the family become possible. Once enough time has passed, it seems natural to have the older siblings help out with the younger ones. So it was with the Church after the first few centuries went by: the blessings that God was showering on the great saints long after they themselves were dead gradually became available to the younger members of the Church.
Eventually the Popes decreed that certain works which were suitable for promoting the common good of the Church could replace all penitential practices. Then the faithful who were genuinely sorry for their sins, and had confessed them, and had done such works, were granted by Gods mercy, and trusting in His apostles power, the most complete forgiveness possible for their sins (Pope Paul VI).
VII. Indulgences: what and why?
Eternal punishment for mortal sin cannot be removed by indulgences: only the infinite power of Christ can do that in the soul of someone who is truly contrite. It is the non-eternal punishment that is the subject of indulgences, and here, even the non-infinite contributions of our older siblings can contribute. An indulgence means taking away the after-effects of sin when the guilt is already forgiven. An indulgence is an action on the part of the Church to spread the treasury amassed by Christ and by our older siblings to the less fortunate members of the family of God.
Why does the Church want us to gain indulgences? First, they help us to expiate our sins. Second, they encourage us to do works of piety, penitence, and charity. Third, when we gain an indulgence, we are admitting that by our own power, we cannot adequately remedy the harm we have done to ourselves or to Gods world by our sins. Finally, indulgences remind us of the enormous liberality which God gives to those who love him: we can honestly say that we are taking advantage of blessings which God is still pouring out on people who loved him centuries ago. Indulgences make me truly feel like a member of the Church.
VIII. Pennies from the youngsters: the holy souls.
Indulgences show how closely knit we are as the family of God. They remind us of the good lives which our older siblings lived. And although these older siblings are much richer than we will ever be, nevertheless, the doctrine of indulgences does not by any means sneer at the little we can contribute. What we have to offer may seem like pennies compared with what the giants of the Church have contributed. Just as in a human family, the youngest members cannot come u with much spending money when they want to but Christmas presents: but family spirit is built up when even these youngest members contribute what they can. So it is in the Church: we who are alive today, the youngsters in the family of God, can gain indulgences to help the holy souls, our suffering brothers in purgatory. When we do this, we are practicing charity in what Pope Paul calls an outstanding way.
IX. Plenary and partial indulgences
Certain pious exercises carry with them indulgences which have the effect that ALL of the after-effects of sin are removed. These are called plenary (or complete) indulgences. Other indulgences remove only some of the after-effects: these are called partial indulgences. In older prayer books, you may see a period of time attached to certain prayers: this meant that the indulgence was only partial. The time period meant that if I say that prayer, the after-effects of my sin are removed to the same extent and they would have been if I had endured one of the penances of the early Church for that length of time. However, Pope Paul in 1967, in his role as chief dispenser of the treasury of the Church, decreed that no time intervals would any longer be assigned to partial indulgences. Plenary indulgences can be gained in several ways. For example, by spending at least one half-hour in adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, or in reading the Scriptures with the veneration due the Divine Word; reciting the Rosary in a church with pious meditation on the mysteries; praying the Stations of the Cross. These indulgences are available at all times of the year. Certain practices carry plenary indulgences only at certain times of the year. For example, each day from November 1 to November 8, a plenary indulgence applicable only to the souls in Purgatory is granted to the faithful who devoutly visit a cemetery and pray for the dead. On All Souls Day, a plenary indulgence, also applicable only to the souls in purgatory, is granted to the faithful who piously visit a Church and recite one Our Father and the Creed. Other feasts of the Church on which plenary indulgences can be obtained include the Sacred Heart, Christ the King, Pentecost, Lenten Fridays, and the Easter Vigil.
X. Conditions for gaining indulgences
While it is true that indulgences are gifts to those of us who are members of Christs Catholic Church, there are certain conditions for gaining them. To gain a plenary indulgence, the indulgenced practice must be performed, and the following conditions must be fulfilled: (i) sacramental confession; (ii) Eucharistic communion; (iii) prayer for the Popes intentions (Our Father and one Hail Mary). Further, it is necessary to be free from all attachment to any sin at all, even venial sin. Why should we pray for the Popes intentions? Because we have access to indulgences through the generosity of the Church, of which the Pope is the visible head on earth.
The three conditions may be fulfilled several days before or after the indulgenced work has been performed. One sacramental confession suffices to gain several plenary indulgences. But for each plenary indulgence, communion must be received, and prayers for the Popes intentions must be said.
No more than one plenary indulgence can be gained in one day, except on the day of death.
Dr. Dermott J. Mullan is a Professor at the University of Delaware where he does research on magnetic fields in stars. Born and raised in Northern Ireland, he first came to the USA to study for his Ph. D. He met his wife at the Newman Center at the University of Maryland. They now have ten children, ranging in age from 10 to 29. This is his first article in HPR.
TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ecumenism; Theology
KEYWORDS: atonement; communion; communionofsaints; error; indulgences; manmade; merit; mistakes; reformation; saints; treasureofmerits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-117 last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator
To: seamole; armydoc
"that the Church is protected by the divine gift of infallibility (Mt 16:18)"
Sorry, just had to break in here.
Where in the wide world of sports does it say "infallibility" in:
"And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."
????
To: seamole
"Really? Where in the Bible is God's justice expressed in terms like "more than likely"?"
The Bible is clear that those who do not pursue righteousness will not see life. Period. The reason I said "more that likely" is because I believe it is possible for a person to become spiritually confused and loose the way for a time - even a long time - but eventually come back around. But the habitual sinner or the characteristically worldly person, religion or no, will not see the life to come. They may think that their life-long participation in Catholic ritual may allow them to "burn it off" in "purgatory" but if their hearts have never truly been changed by Christ in spiritual regeneration, they will die in their sins.
"Anyone consoled by Purgatory either does not understand it or does not believe in it."
I know many who believe that. It is akin to the person who believes they can wait and get right with God on their deathbed.
"The pains associated with the worst possible martyrdom on earth are nothing compared to the horrible pain associated with the lightest sentence in Purgatory."
What do you base this belief on?
"How many of these errors have been multiplied by the doctrine of sola scriptura? In its name so many have justified abortion, priestesses, aggressive war, homosexual marriage and even the stoning of adulteresses. And this is the result of sola scriptura understood correctly. The Scriptures themselves may be misunderstood, but the doctrine is not."
Well, then, in all fairness are we to lay the sodomizing of small children by homosexual priests and ensuing coverup by self-serving Bishops at the feet of the Magesterium? And is this the result of a Church taught correctly and infallibly by the Magesterium?
""Whose sins you forgive they are forgiven!" - who would not want the Apostles to forgive their sins?!?"
Have you never wondered why the Apostles are never shown "forgiving sins" in the NT? Let me put this to you - it is because the only proper use of the power to forgive sins in the NT is via the Apostolic commission to preach the Gospel - something we see the Apostles doing every chance they get! It is only though the preaching of the Gospel that the Apostles can share with others the one thing that brings the forgiveness of sins - belief in Jesus Christ.
Comment #104 Removed by Moderator
To: seamole
Whatever the Church proposes for his belief as revealed by God.
Yes, of course. Appropriately vague.
the Church is protected by the divine gift of infallibility
But, you're not going to go out on a limb and state which Church teachings and directives are infallable, are you?
105
posted on
01/25/2006 9:09:58 PM PST
by
armydoc
To: PetroniusMaximus; seamole
According to St. Francis de Sales, purgatory is sort of a mixed bag. It's hot, but there is also joy and consolation. Apparently, it's more of a "dry heat."
In a more positive light, St. Francis de Sales wrote of the sufferings of Purgatory, but as they are mitigated by the consolations which accompany them: "We may draw from the thought of Purgatory more consolation than apprehension. The greater part of those who dread Purgatory so much think more of their own interests than of the interests of Gods glory; this proceeds from the fact that they think only of the sufferings without considering the peace and happiness which are there enjoyed by the holy souls. It is true that the torments are so great that the most acute sufferings of this life bear no comparison to them; but the interior satisfaction which is there enjoyed is such that no prosperity nor contentment upon earth can equal it. The souls are in a continual union with God." (Espirit de St. Francois de Sales, IX, p. 16, quoted in Purgatory by Rev. F. X. Shouppe, S.J.)
Comment #107 Removed by Moderator
To: seamole
As I suspected. You are unwilling to identify any Church teachings as infallible. Infallibility loses its value when one cannot even identify which teachings are infallible and which are not. Catholics, then are left to decide for themselves if a teaching conforms to Scripture. Hey, that's what us protestants do!
108
posted on
01/26/2006 8:06:05 AM PST
by
armydoc
To: seamole
""The gates of Hell shall not prevail against" the Church. "
Don't you see here that you are reading far more into this passage then it actually says???
"The gates of Hell shall not prevail against the Church, therefore the Church shall neither fail in Her mission nor fall against the assaults of the devil, Satan, the Deceiver"
What is in view here is the fact that death will not be able to hold out against the victory of Christ. "Gates" keeps people out - they don't "attack" people! It is not the picture of Hades attacking Christ's church, but of the impossibility of death's victory over the church. Another verse that states says very nearly the same thing is in Acts 2...
"God raised Him up, ending the pains of death, because it was not possible for Him to be held by it. Seeing this in advance, he spoke concerning the resurrection of the Messiah: He was not left in Hades, and His flesh did not experience decay. "
The "Gates of Death (Sheol, "hell") is a phrase from the Old Testament meaning to die (or be near death) and go to the afterlife.
Psalm 9:13
"Be gracious to me, O LORD! See my affliction from those who hate me,O you who lift me up from the gates of death,"
The verse says NOTHING about being deceived or deception.
"The Catholic Church shall not fall to the Deceiver, Satan, or to any of the deceivers who have gone out into the world "
Well, unless you can provide a better basis for or proof of your exegesis of this verse, it would seem the Catholics have been deceived - about this very passage!
Comment #110 Removed by Moderator
To: seamole
So to sum up your logic: You've demanded an infallible presentation of all the infallible teachings of the Catholic Church in the format of your choice. Some guy you ran into on the Internet won't give this to you. Therefore, the Catholic Church doesn't exist.
To sum up your position, infallibility does exist in the Church, even if you can't point out exactly which teachings are infallible. Not much comfort, is it? Imagine a barrel full of apples. You are told that there are definitely some pure, unadulterated apples in there. But, there are also poisoned apples. Can't tell the difference from looking at them. Knowing that there are good apples in the barrel doesn't help me, if I can't identify them. I guess you just eat them all and realize you are being poisoned.
Scripture is my standard for spiritual knowledge. My belief and underlying assumption is that Scripture is infallible. If I run across an apparent contradiction, the possibility of error is not on my list because of my underlying assumption. I must dig deeper to look for the resolution, which usually brings me to a deeper understanding of scripture while resolving the conflict at the same time. Do you believe the same about the teachings of the Church? That it is free from error?
Catholics, then are left to decide for themselves if a teaching conforms to Scripture. Hey, that's what us protestants do!
This is a shameless falsehood. The Catholic faith existed before Scripture was written, let alone before it was canonized in 400 AD. The faith was passed down from the Apostles directly to their successors.
I'm failing to see what the age of the Church has to do with our discussion. Unless you are saying that ALL of Catholic teaching is infallible- are you?
A final question for you: are the teachings in Trent, Vatican I, and Vatican II infallible?
111
posted on
01/26/2006 5:50:41 PM PST
by
armydoc
Comment #112 Removed by Moderator
Comment #113 Removed by Moderator
Comment #114 Removed by Moderator
Comment #115 Removed by Moderator
To: seamole
To which "broader issue" do you refer?
Notwithstanding the glaring, obvious and dangerous errors found in the English translation by a friendly SSPXer, I find Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma to be a fine work.
Here is an example of one of the many dangerous errors to be found in the English translation of Ott's seminal work:
E.383, line 15: Emmanuel Maignan is designated O.Min. However Maignan was not a Franciscan as this title would indicate, but of the Order of Minims (O.Minim.) as F rightly indicates.
Horrors.
Comment #117 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-117 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson