Replies

William Meister found the fossils of several trilobites, in Utah in 1968, in a fossilized, sandeled footprint of a man. Why is this signifigant you may ask? Well, according to people who believe in evolution, the trilobites are the very earliest lifeform. Therefore, trilobites and man should not be anywhere near the same time period. They are many millions of years apart, supposedly, by the evolutionary time scale.

There are also problems with evolutionary theory on another accounts. Manmade artifacts have been discovered in solid rock strata (layers) that some claimed were laid over billions of years ago: a thimble, bell, gold chain, coins, doll etc.... There was a modern iron hammer that was discovered embedded in stone near London, Texas. Geologists had computed that rock layer to be 4 hundred million years old.

One creationist theory proposed by Russel Humphreys, who holds a theory that perhaps God used sort of a "white hole" to create the universe. And since time doesn't move as fast in higher gravities as it does in lower gravities, if the Earth was at or toward the center of this "white hole", it would be at this high gravity part. Therefore as God "Stretched out the heaveans", the outer part of this "white hole" would be moving at a faster rate in time compared to the inner part where the Earth is. Thereby causing the universe to perhaps look billions of years old, while the earth remains young. This would also explain the Earth being able to see distant star light, despite the universe only being 6000 years old. And it would explain why we can see spiral galaxies and other things evolutionists can't explain. (Spiral galaxies, for example, in them the inner stars rotate faster than the outer stars, and if they were really billions of years old, they would look more like a featureless disc rather than a spiral."

recently scientists have found out that the supposed "neaderthal man" wasn't very primative at all but actually more advanced than we are today. They found that "neanderthal man" seemed to have better enzymes than we do today and even longer lifespans than we do today. And the reason for their odd facial features was do to a prolonged lifespan, because if someone was able to live hundreds of years, while they won't grow taller, bones in the face do continue to grow. And this is what the "neandertal man's" bone features seem to indicate. And if you have ever seen drawings of neandertal man, most evolutionists draw him looking apelike. This is to fit their evolutionary viewpoint of "monkeys to men". But how do they come up with these drawings? Well, they do this by looking at the bones and developing drawings from them. Problem is, because of their evolutionary viewpoint, they try and set the bones in the face region, particularly the jaw bone, to make the neandertal man look more apelike. In fact, on some skeletons they have even sawed off part of the jaw to make it look more ape-like. The problem is, the way they have the jaw bone set, the teeth will not fit together properly. But when you set the teeth in proper occlusion, they suddenly look more human like and their faces look considerably smaller.

Also there is one scientist, who's name I can't think of off the top of my head that is an evolutionist. He went to Africa and found living dinosaurs and wrote book about.

There is a good video out there people might be able to pick up for free off the net call "100 reasons why evolution is stupid" If you search around enough sites your bound to find somewhere you can download it. if i can find the link I'll post it. Anyway in it the guy has pictures of things like fossil human footprint found next to a trilobite.

ANd I can't believe some of you never heard about the trilobite being found next to a human footprint. You obviously go to some piss poor school.s All my EVOLUTIONARY science teachers even know about this. You can read many evolutionists books discussing such things. This is some pretty widely known news and shouldn't be new to anyway that seriously studies the subject