If you spoke in terms of scripture I might be able to understand what you're trying to point out, but your post is the whole point of my query and a great example of Catholics focusing on extraneous stuff that has NOTHING to do with leading people to Christ, only to Catholicism. I'm not saying what you wrote is bad, or wrong, it would just take a theologian or a philosopy professor to understand it. Compare what you wrote to John 3:16. Why is it that rank-and-file Christians of other sects can discuss this topic intelligbly, while to you the language is impenetrable?
You seem to think sophisticated discussion is evidence of sinfullness and error. Perhaps you should avoid threads discussing theology, since it is apparently an occasion of sin for you.
SD