Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
Actually what sounds like a rarity is where "the whole church be come together in one place". If we glean from that verse that the presence of unbelievers in the assembly is rare then we would likewise have to glean that the assembly of the whole church together in one place itself would have also to be considered a rare event.

It is very possible that you are right about that too. I have no doubt they rarely got together in one place, considering the persecution they were under. Jesus said himself 'wherever two or three are gathered'- so the size of the assembly, it sounds, doesn't matter much. And it certainly doesn't mean that where only one believer is, as I'm sure you would agree, Jesus is not there.

That is a copout for believers too scared to stand alone in the world for Christ.

To the weak I became as weak.

I honestly don't see how that applies here. ya have me going "HUH?" with that one... and of course, that is the one text that every church growth teacher uses to justify Church Growth philosophy.

Now I will say it again -- Taking on the customs and culture of the time is not in and of itself necessarily bad. But putting out of the church those who don't wish to do so IS bad, and that is what happens at these churches. The minority's 'felt needs' are not considered, which belies where the focus is -- on the numbers.

Now, if you're going to say 'when I was with the GenXers I became as a GenXr that's fine, but if you don't present the clear gospel to them,then you are using it as a cloaking device. Rick does not present the gospel in his books, and I haven't heard it in a message or in anything he's said publicly, in fact, more often I hear him say things that are mutually exclusive to the gospel (e.g. saying the five fundamentals are 'narrow' when they are exactly the opposite!) and saying "anyone can be saved if you just find the key to their heart" -- that smacks of pelagianism, or semipelagianism, synergeia, and heresy.

So are we to say from that 'to the sinners I became a sinner'? To the prostitutes I became a prostitute? Just how far do we draw this 'when in Rome' analogy?

583 posted on 01/12/2006 1:12:48 PM PST by Terriergal (Cursed be any love or unity for whose sake the Word of God must be put at stake. -- Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies ]


To: Terriergal; lupie; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; xzins

Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'm off for the day.

Thank you for the stimulating conversation, and the forum in which to exercise the specifics of our faith. While we may differ on how we got here, we can (I hope) all rejoice in that we ARE in Christ and look forward to our day of Glorification.

Blessings,

IOTN


586 posted on 01/12/2006 1:17:08 PM PST by ItsOurTimeNow ("Hail Him who saved you by His grace, and crown Him Lord of All")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]

To: Terriergal
But putting out of the church those who don't wish to do so IS bad, and that is what happens at these churches.

I would agree, but once the people who have been ordained to make the decisions on the direction the church will take have made their decisions, I don't believe that you are scripturally in any place to continue to complain. For better or worse God has ordained that the church will go in this direction and your choice at that point is to follow the shepherd or find a new one.

Undoubtedly God led you away from your former church. God very well may have led others to it.

587 posted on 01/12/2006 1:18:12 PM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson