What I am trying to say is that I question if the methods are "unbiblical" or just non-traditional.
Jesus was/is quite non-traditional. Change is a good thing sometimes. Judging a tree by it's fruit (and I don't mean monetary) is also a good way to look at this.
Regarding the fluff thing. What I've seen of Warrens work (I looked up some of it) DOES include meat. Like the apostles, some was "spiritual milk" and some was meat. I guess any judgment of Warrens words would have to consider the audience at the time they were being said
>>Change is a good thing sometimes.<<
The cannon of scripture is finished. God's revelation to us is complete. Why is there a need for something "new"? Did God not foresee evanelism in the 21st century?
The same model for preaching and reaching the lost as shown in Acts still applies today. There's nothing new under the sun.
Absolutely a valid point. I couldn't agree more.
Which of his things have you seen that are 'meat'?
One can't not preach the whole counsel of God and be Biblical.
One can't promote, endorse and associate with known false teachers and be Biblical.
One can't consistently take Scripture out of context and be Biblical.
One can't sing Purple Haze in front of an Angel Stadium crowd and be Biblical.
One can't promote other faiths and other faith practices and be Biblical.
One can't deride the Five Fundamentals and be Biblical.
etc.