Every once and awhile it's helpful to see just how different the RC approach to salvation is from the Protestant understanding of salvation.
The work of the Holy Spirit is faith being made visible in our hearts and minds. But the only thing that saves is God's grace by the shed blood of Christ, who put Himself on the cross to pay for our sins so we can be judged innocent before God. Nothing more is "required."
"The necessity of Christ's satisfaction to divine justice is, as it were, the center and hinge of all doctrines of pure revelation. Other doctrines are of little importance comparatively except as they have respect to this." -- JONATHAN EDWARDS
Q29: How are we made partakers of the redemption purchased by Christ?
A: We are made partakers of the redemption purchased by Christ, by the effectual application of it to us (1), by his Holy Spirit (2).
~~1. "As many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name" (John 1:12).
~~2. "Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour." (Titus 3:5, 6).
The Bible teaches that God accepts men solely on the merits of Jesus Christ (Rom. 3:21-4:8; Phil. 3:8-9). Men are declared righteous because their guilt is imputed to Christ on the cross, and Christ's perfect righteousness is imputed to the believer's account. Romanism teaches that grace is infused into man and that people are justified only after becoming righteous. Justification is subjective; it is the internal renovation and renewing of man. Men are justified because of what the Holy Spirit does in them. "Justification means that man himself is made just—made pleasing to God in his own person.... A devout Catholic may say: 'Righteousness by faith means that I cannot save myself, but by faith I can receive God's transforming grace. His grace can change my heart, and by His grace in my heart I can be acceptable in His sight....' The focal point of Catholic theology is God's work of grace within human experience." The Scriptures teach that justification is an instantaneous act of God. It is whole, never repeated, eternal and perfect, not piecemeal or gradual (Jn. 5:25; Lk. 18:13, 14; 23:43; Rom. 4:5; 5:1; 8:3-8). Romanism teaches that justification is a gradual process which may not even be completed in this life. It usually is completed by the tortures of purgatory. The Bible teaches that sinners are saved solely because of what God has done in Jesus Christ. Papal doctrine affirms that justification is a cooperative effort between God and man. Man must cooperate with inward grace until he achieves justification. The Roman Catholic believes that good works contribute to his salvation..." -- Justification by Faith - Part II: The Roman Catholic Doctrine of Justification by Brian Schwertley "The Bible teaches that justification is a legal declaration of God in heaven regarding the sinner who believes on earth. Justification is objective. The Romanist confounds the doctrine of justification with sanctification. "The Tridentine theory makes inward holiness in conjunction with the merits of Christ the ground of justification. It founds human salvation upon two corner-stones.... The unintentional confounding of the distinction between justification and sanctification, which appears occasionally in the Patristic writers, becomes a deliberate and unemphatic identification, in the scheme of the Papal church."
"There is no such thing as merit; but all who are justified are justified for nothing (gratis), and this is credited to no one but to the grace of God..." -- Martin Luther
"One of the great truths of salvation is that of justification. But what is justification? The heart of the Reformation controversy was over the meaning of this word and despite the impression given by ECT, the Roman Catholic and Protestant Churches are still very much at odds with one another on this issue.
"The Reformers claimed that the Roman Catholic Church had perverted the true biblical meaning of the term by insisting on the necessity of works and sacraments as the basis for justification. And the Roman Church charged that the Reformer's teaching of faith alone (sola fide) and imputed righteousness was unbiblical and itself a perversion of the gospel message. In order to properly evaluate these two positions it is essential that we understand correctly what the bible teaches on this subject. And this begins with a biblical understanding of the nature of God. Why? Because all biblical teaching on salvation is rooted in the character of God himself..."
And finally, that most excellent essay by Charles Hodge...
In opposition to this doctrine, the Reformers maintained that by justification the Scriptures mean something different from sanctification. That the two gifts, although inseparable, are distinct, and that justification, instead of being an efficient act changing the inward character of the sinner, is a declarative act, announcing and determining his relation to the Law and justice of God. In the second place, the Symbols of the Reformation no less explicitly teach that justification is not simply pardon and restoration. It includes pardon, but it also includes a declaration that the believer is just or righteous in the sight of the Law. He has a right to plead a righteousness which completely satisfies its demands. And, therefore, in the third place, affirmatively, those Symbols teach that justification is a judicial or forensic act, i.e., an act of God as Judge proceeding according to Law, declaring that the sinner is just, i.e., that the Law no longer condemns him, but acquits and pronounces him to be entitled to eternal life...""By this the Reformers intended, in the first place, to deny the Romish doctrine of subjective justification. That is, that justification consists in an act of God making the sinner subjectively holy. Romanists confound or unite justification and sanctification. They define justification as "the remission of sin and infusion of new habits of grace." By remission of sin they mean not simply pardon, but the removal of everything of the nature of sin from the soul. Justification, therefore, with them, is purely subjective, consisting in the destruction of sin and the infusion of holiness.
"For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus." -- Romans 3:23-26
Saved by grace alone through faith in Jesus Christ alone.
"But the only thing that saves is God's grace by the shed blood of Christ, who put Himself on the cross to pay for our sins so we can be judged innocent before God. Nothing more is "required."
Amen!
Just as I am, without one plea,
But that Thy blood was shed for me,
And that Thou bidst me come to Thee,
O Lamb of God, I come, I come.
Just as I am, and waiting not
To rid my soul of one dark blot,
To Thee whose blood can cleanse each spot,
O Lamb of God, I come, I come.
Just as I am, poor, wretched, blind;
Sight, riches, healing of the mind,
Yea, all I need in Thee to find,
O Lamb of God, I come, I come.
Just as I am, Thou wilt receive,
Wilt welcome, pardon, cleanse, relieve;
Because Thy promise I believe,
O Lamb of God, I come, I come.
Just as I am, Thy love unknown
Hath broken every barrier down;
Now, to be Thine, yea, Thine alone,
O Lamb of God, I come, I come.
Just as I am, of that free love
The breadth, length, depth, and height to prove,
Here for a season, then above,
O Lamb of God, I come, I come!
As long as it is done CORRECTLY, I see no problem, and find this quite useful to both of us. However, what disappoints is when our (Catholic) view is misrepresented - or worse - the person is misled by partial truths. Satan has a knack for doing just that intentionally. I hope you are not doing the same intentionally.
The work of the Holy Spirit is faith being made visible in our hearts and minds. But the only thing that saves is God's grace by the shed blood of Christ, who put Himself on the cross to pay for our sins so we can be judged innocent before God. Nothing more is "required."
That is a partial truth. Yes, Jesus blood is objectively the only thing that saves. However, since Christ died for ALL men (and women), then something "else" is needed to separate the "saved" from the "unsaved". What is it that, despite Christ's Redemptive Work, that sends some to hell (according to Christ's implications)? The missing piece of the formula is man's response - guided by the Spirit - to the initiative of God's Calling. Faith is a gift from God - and a response from man. A "yes" to the will of the Father.
Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour." (Titus 3:5, 6).
Yes, now we introduce Baptism into the formula of salvation. Men come to be baptised, a response to the Call. Man is not initially justified by any work. But just the same, man must respond to that call, that gift of faith - for man can reject the Spirit.
The Tridentine theory makes inward holiness in conjunction with the merits of Christ the ground of justification.
As does Christ. I again mention Matthew 5:20, which you have never effectively responded to... Man's holiness, his righteousness, is based on our sharing in the life of Christ, not on the man's own work - another half-truth expressed by the "Protesters". John's Gospel makes it clear that a disciple of Christ can perform "works even greater than these" BY ABIDING in Christ - the Divine Life of the Father and Son are shared with the Disciple, enabling the Disciple to BECOME righteous.
The Romanist confounds the doctrine of justification with sanctification.
And the "Protester" seperates the doctrine of justification from sanctification, making the former a one-time event ONLY, when Scriptures CLEARLY make salvation a PROCESS. Was David justified in God's eyes when he committed adultery? Not according to Paul in Romans, or David in the various Psalms of contrition, such as Ps 51... Before the adulterous murder, an action that causes one to be disinherited from the Kingdom, according to Paul, David was the "apple of God's eyes". He lost this "status" as a result of his sin. However, due to the promptings of sorrow brought on by the Spirit, David realized that he had sinned and was considered wicked. By throwing himself at the mercy of God, trusting that God would forgive him, David again became righteous in God's eyes, justified again.
Papal doctrine affirms that justification is a cooperative effort between God and man. Man must cooperate with inward grace until he achieves justification. The Roman Catholic believes that good works contribute to his salvation..."
This is the Church's interpretation of the Sacred Scriptures and Sacred Tradition passed down from the Apostles. Perhaps part of the confusion is our differences in terminology. YOU use "justification" to mean that one-time acceptance of Jesus as Lord and Savior. We call that "initial justification", "initial righteousness". THIS is based on faith without any merit on our part. However, justification is an ongoing process. Thus, we see that being seen by God as righteous ultimately depends on faith AND good works imbued within us by the Spirit. Faith alone doesn't save.
"What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith [without works] save him?" James 2:14
Now, perhaps you will say that works are a fruit of faith. But note the highlighted part above. The QUESTION James asks is "Can faith [without works] save him?" Obviously, a rhetorical question with the answer "NO". Thus, the "Protesters" fail to include the entire Scriptures into their "system". Rather than taking this into account, they prefer to ignore it or pretend it doesn't say anything about salvation. Quite clearly, it does!
CAN FAITH [without works] SAVE HIM? NO!
I do not intend on reading William Webster's diatribes. If you think you can defend your position, use your own words. Please do not refer me to some long-winded post that would take a book to refute.
Saved by grace alone through faith in Jesus Christ alone.
IF that was the "formula" of our religion, it seems funny to me that the Bible DENIES parts of it... "You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only." James 2:24
"For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love." Gal 5:6
"though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing." 1 Cor 13:2
"...God, who will render to each one according to his deeds, eternal life to those who by patient continuance in doing good seek for glory, honor, and immortality; but to those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness--indignation and wrath, tribulation and anguish, on every soul of man who does evil" Romans 2:6-9
"And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is [the book] of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire." Rev 20:12-15
Clearly, yours is a formula that fails to take into account parts of Scripture. It should not come as a surprise that Luther wanted to toss James or Revelation out of Sacred Scriptures because it didn't fit into his little theological constructs. By ignoring Scriptures, how can you conclude that you are a "Sola Scriptura" person? Is the Bible your final authority, or Martin Luther's invention?
Regards