Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Forest Keeper; kosta50; InterestedQuestioner; jo kus
If she never had any intention on having conjugal relations with a man, then she would be guilty of dishonoring her parents

Unless, as was the case, her parents Joachim and Anna intended the marriage to be a custodial marriage.

6,154 posted on 05/10/2006 3:29:42 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6036 | View Replies ]


To: annalex; kosta50; InterestedQuestioner; jo kus; 1000 silverlings; HarleyD; Dr. Eckleburg; ...
FK: "If she [Mary] never had any intention on having conjugal relations with a man, then she would be guilty of dishonoring her parents."

Unless, as was the case, her parents Joachim and Anna intended the marriage to be a custodial marriage.

Putting aside that your assertion is 100% extra-scriptural, what is a "custodial marriage"? After a search, New Advent did not recognize the term. What was the point in actually getting married since Joseph could have provided for her financially equally as well, if they were not married.

PLUS, the Protoevangelium says that she was from a wealthy family, but Joseph could not have been rich because they made a poor man's sacrifice after Jesus was born. This does not make sense. Given all this, if Joseph really was the old, old, uncle with one foot in the grave, as has been asserted by someone in this discussion, then it really would have been Mary taking care of him, if anything. But no one has argued that.

6,623 posted on 05/14/2006 8:20:42 PM PDT by Forest Keeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson