Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex; HarleyD; Forest Keeper; 1000 silverlings; Full Court
I wasn't trying to amuse you.

So if it was a joke, but it was not meant for me to enjoy, then was it a remark made at my expense?

That's not very nice.

Do you have a substantive comment?

I do, but I prefer to think back on your comments that we should preach the Gospel to animals. It gives a whole new meaning (or does it?) to Matthew 7:6.

6,035 posted on 05/09/2006 3:54:36 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6014 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg; annalex
that we should preach the Gospel to animals

Unbelievable that someone could think "creature" here meant cows, sheep, dogs etc. Every "creature" would mean a thinking creature, obviously. If there's a joke in there somewhere, I'm missing it as well.

6,037 posted on 05/09/2006 4:03:37 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6035 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; Forest Keeper; 1000 silverlings; Full Court

Matthew 7:6 would prohibit givng any sacraments to animals, but it has never been traditionally understood as a prohibition on blessing them, -- or indeed teaching the Gospel to them in the ways that they can understand it. Obviously, there is no point in doing so verbally, but when we are kind to animals and give them our friendship, that is teaching them the Gospel.


6,149 posted on 05/10/2006 1:39:48 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6035 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson