"...when you decided to end the post with a polemical and false characterization of the Reformation followed by a false dilemma question..."
As to polemics, I thought that you enjoyed that sort of thing. Most guys who use the word "Romish" on a regular basis tend to be signaling that they enjoy polemics. Dittor for anyone who states categorically that Orthodox are Origenists. I certainly didn't mean to hurt anyone's feelings.
I'm more than happy to discuss the details of exactly what you believe happened with the deposit of the faith between the death of the last Apostle and the onset of the Reformation. If what I wrote is a mischaracterization, then help me frame it in a way you would agree with. I think you know that I believe in the importance of establishing the other guy's position in a way that they would agree with before proceeding with meaningful discussion.
"Later, hoping that might have changed, I revisited the question. So no, I don't see any need for you to revisit the issue."
Hm. I'm not sure I understand whether you want to revisit the issue or not. I'm still here, and I think I'm fairly easy to get along with.