everyone can see that.
The discussion you entered was concerning the truth of the content of those spurious documents.
You may try to convince yourself otherwise, but you are only convincing yourself.
You still haven't proven that the documents are spurious this is the second time you used those words without any proof. Frankly it seems more logical to take the word of someone who lived in the second century over some desk jockey who says his way is the only way.
Obviously you came with an anti-Christian agenda, and are acting like a troll.
attacking your opponent because you argument has run out is more along the lines of a troll.
"You still haven't proven that the documents are spurious"
That's 1,800-year-old history. Catch up.