Well, you failed with the first one. Perfectly normal photographs, the only point of which was to illustrate crypsis. But why the ludicrous over reaction to this in the first place? I thought this was exactly the kind of "micro-evolution" that creationists readily agree with? (Indeed creationists generally get upset when they are stereotyped as holding to absolute fixed species.) I thought creationists agreed that natural selection is behind changes just like this?
How do you guys wave your arms and say that ALL dogs, i.e. the entire family canidae, or ALL horses, i.e. the entire family equidae (in the later case with many species having different numbers of chromosomes!) represent single "created kinds," and then throw a hissing fit over a month changing color?
It's just bizarre!
Correction to my previous... I've recently learned that not just horses but dogs also apparently have differing chromosome numbers among species.