[Ronaldus Magnus]

I chose the word dishonest...

You have proven yourself unworthy of rational debate on this topic by repeating this unwarranted slander in a desperate attempt to use fallacious ad hominem attacks to bolster your failing argument. I'll save my discussion for a more worthy representative of your religion and instead use that time to pray to the Blessed Mother of God, the Most Holy Virgin Mary, that she, along with all the other angles and saints, intercede for mercy on your behalf with her Son, Jesus Christ, Our Lord and Savior.

[PetroniusMaximus]

"You have proven yourself unworthy of rational debate on this topic by repeating this unwarranted slander in a desperate attempt to use fallacious ad hominem attacks to bolster your failing argument."



I see you have no answers to my points.

You seem to have exceedinly thin skin - I've been called far far worse names by your Catholic bretheren her on FR.

When you tried to build your argument on the claim that Jesus was not exempt were you, or were you not aware that many of the same authors specifically exempt him elswhere in their writings?

Yes or No?

[PetroniusMaximus]

"...by repeating this unwarranted slander"

P.S. I do apologize if you took it personally.

I don't know you from Adam, so I did not intend it as a personal attack. You may be the most stand-up guy in the world. I was addressing the substance of your argument (which I have heard from other Catholics BTW) and which I find to be a disingenuous form of reasoning.

My conflict is with ideas, not people (in most cases).