Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackElk

I see you are still spouting the same old tired lies.

Here's a little bit of truth for you, your eminence.

You are not the person who decides how Rome will negotiate with the SSPX.

So stuff it.

Don't make me come back on here regularly to mop the floor up with you.

And drop this utterly stupid mode of thinking that "because a Pope says something it must be true." That's utter stupidity with nothing in Catholic teaching to back it up.



64 posted on 11/27/2005 6:53:40 AM PST by Gerard.P (The lips of liberals drip with honey while their hands drip with blood--Bishop Williamson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Gerard.P; ninenot; sittnick; Tax-chick; ArrogantBustard; Salvation
Turn your mirror to the wall.

Bell, book, candle. Rack, strappado, pit, pendulum, iron maiden, thumbscrews.

If and when, and may it NEVER be the case, a pope should modify leniently or remove the judgment of schism against SSPX and the excommunication of its adherents (this means YOU), get back to actual Catholics with the news but make sure it was printed in L'Osservatore Romano and not in such schismatic propaganda rags as The Angelus or the Remnant which have no more credibility than does the National antiCatholic Reporter.

You can tell the quality of a person by the enemies the person keeps. I am proud to have you and the other schizzies as enemies.

Which pope (that would be someone who has reached the level of Vicar of Christ on Earth/nothing to do with Econe/nothing to do with spitting on the papacy/not an excommunicated bishop or archbishop/not some Vatican bureaucratic subordinate but an actual pope) has reversed Pope John Paul II's judgment of schism and excommunication against you guys? That could ONLY have been JP II or B-XVI. Pope/date/document officially promulgated???? Oh, that's right, neither of them. May that continue to be the case until you all submit to being frog-marched through Vatican Square in sackcloth, ashes and utter humiliation as you deserve and weep oceans of tears begging and pleading for mercy from the papacy that you all revile.

It is TRUTH that SSPX adherents were adjudged EXCOMMUNICATED by JP II and that SSPX was declared and adjudged a SCHISM by him. You do not like your sentence as an "adherent" any more than Scott Peterson liked being sentenced to physical death for the murder of his wife and child, but it is TRUE whether you happen to like it or not. (Douses Gerard P. in Holy Water/Gerard P. does the Wicked Witch of the West routine from similar circumstances with plain water. He's mellllllting!!!!!).

Can the flying schizzie monkeys of dead Marcel be far behind?

67 posted on 11/27/2005 7:31:26 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Gerard.P
And drop this utterly stupid mode of thinking that "because a Pope says something it must be true." That's utter stupidity with nothing in Catholic teaching to back it up.

You also subscribe to this theory, strangely enough.

In your case, however, it applies only to certain Pope's.

The popes of your choosing.

Or else archbishops and bishops of uncertain pedigree.

74 posted on 11/27/2005 11:22:55 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson