Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley
According to the constant Tradition of the Church, baptized males alone may validly receive Holy Orders

**************

Is this document intended to address more than the issue of homosexuality within the priesthood? It seems that it is making a point here.

19 posted on 11/23/2005 5:14:11 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: trisham

According to the constant Tradition of the Church, baptized males alone may validly receive Holy Orders

**************

Is this document intended to address more than the issue of homosexuality within the priesthood? It seems that it is making a point here.


The document's title is:


Instruction concerning the criteria of vocational discernment regarding persons with homosexual tendencies, considering their admission to seminary and to Holy Orders

Therefore, I believe that the purpose is just that.

20 posted on 11/23/2005 5:24:18 AM PST by markomalley (Vivat Iesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: trisham; markomalley
Is this document intended to address more than the issue of homosexuality within the priesthood? It seems that it is making a point here.

I think that line ("baptized males alone may validly receive Holy Orders") was intended to affirm the truth. Women with "chalice envy" may be disturbed by it, but so what...

24 posted on 11/23/2005 6:24:23 AM PST by COBOL2Java (The Katrina Media never gets anything right, so why should I believe them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson