To: annalex; ArrogantBustard; SoothingDave
"Yet Luther complained about the expense of the Basilica of St. Peter in his theses, virtually repeating Judas's line."
Jesus specifically said the display was ok because he was there with them - and that he was there for a limited time.
Comparing expense lavished on the person of Jesus to expense lavished on Basilica of St. Peter would seem to miss the point Jesus makes regarding his absence.
To: PetroniusMaximus; annalex; SoothingDave
The Person of Jesus, eh? Got that raht h'yar:
No, I don't mean the Pope (he's just a man), and No, I don't mean the crucifix (that's just an icon), and No, I don't mean the roses (they're just a decoration), and No, I don't mean the ornately decorated gold object (that's just a monstrance).
One thing left in that picture ...
;'}
106 posted on
11/22/2005 12:12:53 PM PST by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: PetroniusMaximus
So, do you wear nice clothes to church or what?
SD
To: PetroniusMaximus
[H]is absenceWhat absence?
111 posted on
11/22/2005 12:25:15 PM PST by
annalex
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson